0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¹³» ±Ù°Å±â¹Ý ÀÓ»ó°£È£½Ç¹«Áöħ ÁÖÁ¦ÀÇ ¿ì¼±¼øÀ§ °áÁ¤

A Prioritizing for the Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Guidelines Development

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2012³â 18±Ç 1È£ p.39 ~ 51
KMID : 1004620120180010039
±¸¹Ì¿Á ( Gu Mee-Ock ) - °æ»ó´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Á¶¸í¼÷ ( Cho Myoung-Sook ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø
Á¶¿ë¾Ö ( Cho Yong-Ae ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø
Á¤Àç½É ( Jeong Jae-Sim ) - ¿ï»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÓ»óÀü¹®°£È£ÇÐ
Àº¿µ ( Eun Young ) - °æ»ó´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
Á¤Àμ÷ ( Jeong Ihn-Sook ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹ÚÁ¤¼÷ ( Park Jeong-Sook ) - ¼¼ºê¶õ½ºº´¿ø
±èÇýÁ¤ ( Kim Hea-Jeong ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼­¿ï¼º¸ðº´¿ø °£È£ºÎ

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted with an aim to get a kind of priorities in developing the evidence-based nursing practice guidelines in fields.

Methods: This study utilized a two-round Delphi surveys from November to December, 2010 with self-administered questionnaires which had a scale ranged from 0 to 9. A total of 95 head nurses working at the forty different general hospitals was asked to evaluate the priorities in four criteria; patient coverage, certainty, improvement in patient outcome and in nursing practice (first round) and 65 head nurses were asked to decide the importance of the criteria afterwards (second round).

Results: The relative importance of 4 criteria was 22.3% in patient coverage, 26.5% in certainty, 23.5% in improvement of patient outcome, and 27.7% in improvement of nursing practice as the results of the 1st round and 20.6%, 26.6%, 24.8%, and 28.0% for the 2nd round, respectively. Top five nursing practices showed high scores after considering the relative importances of the 4 criteria were medication, intravenous therapy, checking vital sign, pain management, and
diagnostic test or procedures care.

Conclusion: It is recommended to take into account of the priorities that were found in this study when someone intends to develop a evidence-based nursing practice guideline.
KeyWords
±Ù°Å±â¹Ý½Ç¹«, °£È£
Evidence-Based Practice, Nursing
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)